Uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome after uneventful placement of a 1-piece intraocular lens into the capsular bag
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome is an uncommon but serious complication of cataract surgery that occurs from chafing of the iris by an intraocular lens (IOL). UGH syndrome is typically associated with first-generation lenses, placement of an IOL in the ciliary sulcus, or bag-sulcus tilted positioning. UGH syndrome following placement of a modern 1-piece lens in the capsular bag is rare. Patient and clinical findings: A 55-year-old man presented with UGH syndrome 2 weeks after routine cataract surgery with in-the-bag placement of a contemporary IOL. Diagnosis, intervention, and outcomes: Correct positioning of the IOL was confirmed with ultrasound biomicroscopy and exploratory surgery, and IOL exchange achieved resolution of UGH sequelae. Conclusions: Intermittent chafing of the iris by the IOL as a result of underlying traumatic zonulopathy contributed to the development of UGH, and surgeons should be aware of this complication even with in-the-bag placement of a modern IOL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".