Bradycardia associated with ALK inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) inhibitors represent a major therapeutic advance in the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bradycardia was initially observed with crizotinib, the first ALK inhibitor. The risk of bradycardia and whether it differs among various generations of ALK inhibitors has not been systematically described. Purpose The primary objective of this systematic review is to compare the risk of bradycardia in patients who received an ALK inhibitor or standard chemotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC in randomized controlled trials. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials registry. We included randomized controlled trials that compared two different ALK inhibitors, or an ALK inhibitor with standard chemotherapies in patients with NSCLC. The primary outcome of interest was the number of bradycardia events. Because bradycardia was not systematically reported in many trials, we also documented reports of dizziness (as a potential symptom of bradycardia) in a secondary analysis. Results We identified 12 eligible studies including 2915 participants. Bradycardia was reported as a treatment-emergent adverse event in 9 trials; dizziness was reported in the remaining 3 trials. The type of bradycardia and use of heart rate-slowing medications were not documented in most studies. The incidence of bradycardia among 1080 individuals prescribed crizotinib in 8 trials was 13% (95% CI 9–17%) during a mean follow-up of 1.26 years. A meta-analysis of four trials that compared crizotinib with standard chemotherapies (Figure 1) showed a higher risk of bradycardia with crizotinib (RR 19.33; 95% CI 5.40–69.22). Newer generations of ALK inhibitors (alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib) showed similar rates of bradycardia compared to crizotinib (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.21–1.26; Figure 2). Dizziness was more common in ALK inhibitors than standard chemotherapies (RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.38–2.42). Conclusions Our findings suggest that crizotinib is associated with a higher rate of bradycardia than standard chemotherapies, while no difference was found between crizotinib and newer generations of ALK inhibitors. The higher rate of dizziness in ALK inhibitors could represent a symptom of bradycardia. Further research is needed to evaluate the incidence and types of ALK inhibitor-associated bradycardia and its relationship with patient symptoms. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.030 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".