Extraction of a vascular function for a fully automated dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance brain image processing pipeline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a deep-learning model that leverages the spatial and temporal information from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE MR) brain imaging in order to automatically estimate a vascular function (VF) for quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. METHODS: ). A region over the transverse sinus was manually drawn in the dynamic T1-weighted images to provide a ground truth VF. The manual regions and their resulting VF curves were used to train a deep-learning model based on a 3D U-net architecture. The model concurrently utilized the spatial and temporal information in DCE MR images to predict the VF. In order to analyze the contribution of the spatial and temporal terms, different weighted combinations were examined. The manual and deep-learning predicted regions and VF curves were compared. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled in this study and 155 DCE MR scans were processed. The 3D U-net was trained using a loss function that combined the spatial and temporal information with different weightings. The best VF curves were obtained when both spatial and temporal information were considered. The predicted VF curve was similar to the manual ground truth VF curves. CONCLUSION: The use of spatial and temporal information improved VF curve prediction relative to when only the spatial information is used. The method generalized well for unseen data and can be used to automatically estimate a VF curve suitable for quantitative PK modeling. This method allows for a more efficient clinical pipeline and may improve automation of permeability mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".