MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3211297257 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab061.017

23 Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021· review· en· W3211297257 on OpenAlexaffabout
Soumya Thomas, Prashanth Murthy, Amuchou Soraisham, Abhay Lodha

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentMedicinePediatricsToddlerCerebral palsyCohort studyCohortPulmonary hypertensionOdds ratioCognitionInternal medicinePhysical therapyGestational agePsychomotor learningPregnancyPsychiatryPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary Subject area Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Background Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is estimated to occur in 1 in 4 infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD). The impact of PH in infants with BPD on their neurodevelopmental (ND) outcomes is uncertain. Objectives This systematic review aims to evaluate whether PH in infants with BPD is associated with ND delay. Design/Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies that reported ND outcomes of infants with BPD (based on NIH definition) and PH (based on echocardiographic findings of PH at 36 weeks PMA). The primary outcome was ND delay in infants with pulmonary hypertension associated with BPD compared with BPD alone. Standardized developmental tests evaluated ND outcomes at 18-24 months corrected age (CA) and three years of age. Quality assessment of the studies was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment for Cohort studies. Results Three retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Two studies reported ND outcomes based on Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III Edition in cognitive, language, and motor domains at 18-24 months CA (Table 1 and Figure 1). One study reported outcomes at 3 years, including overall developmental delay (Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development [KSPD] scores < 70) and cerebral palsy. The quality of all 3 studies was rated between good, fair, and poor. Pooled data from the 2 studies reporting outcomes at 18-24 months showed no difference between the 2 infant groups for Bayley cognitive score < 85 (Odds ratio [OR]: 3.78; 95% CI 0.87-16.52), Bayley language score < 85 (OR: 1.19; 95% CI0.57-2.49), and Bayley motor score < 85 (OR: 2.04; 95% CI 0.89-4.67). At 3 years of age, children in the BPD-PH group had an increased risk of developmental delay (DQ < 70 in all areas) compared with the BPD group (OR: 4.37; 95% CI 1.16-16.46), but no difference in the risk of cerebral palsy (OR: 0.57; 95%0.03-12.39). Conclusion PH in BPD is not associated with a developmental delay compared to BPD alone at 18-24 months CA. However, a single study showed infants in BPD-PH had delayed development at 3 years of age. A large prospective cohort study with longer multidisciplinary follow-up is required to confirm this.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.034
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→