MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211374344 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2021.3123693

A 24 GHz Self-Calibrated All-Digital FMCW Synthesizer With 0.01% RMS Frequency Error Under 3.2 GHz Chirp Bandwidth and 320 MHz/µs Chirp Slope

2021· article· en· W3211374344 on OpenAlexaff
Zhengkun Shen, Haoyun Jiang, Fan Yang, Yixiao Wang, Zherui Zhang, Junhua Liu, Huailin Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChirpFrequency synthesizerBandwidth (computing)Lookup tablePhysicsDirect digital synthesizerMean squared errorRoot mean squareElectronic engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)MathematicsPhase-locked loopOpticsEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhase noiseStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 24 GHz self-calibrated all-digital frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) synthesizer is presented in this article. A multi-bank digitally controlled oscillator (DCO) is employed to provide adequate frequency tuning range and high frequency resolution. A full background self-calibration scheme is proposed to linearize the DCO tuning curve for highly linear and fast chirp generation. An overlap compensator based on an adaptive lookup table (LUT) is utilized to eliminate the frequency overlaps between adjacent DCO tuning bands. The compensation words in the LUT are altered by least-mean-square (LMS) algorithm for robust and precise matching. A ramp tracker, which features real-time ramp tracking with zero steady-state phase error, is employed to estimate and stabilize the frequency ramp. Implemented in 40 nm bulk CMOS, the FMCW synthesizer prototype consumes 28 mW with a 0.26 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> core area. The maximum chirp bandwidth is 3.2 GHz, corresponding to 13.33% of the center frequency. Measurement results show that the root-mean-square (RMS) frequency error is reduced by 1/10 with self-calibration after 2 ms convergence time. The maximum chirp slope is up to 320 MHz/ <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu \text{s}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> with 309 kHz RMS frequency error. The minimum RMS frequency error is 7.35 kHz under 5 MHz/ <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu \text{s}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> chirp slope, corresponding to 0.0002% of the chirp bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207