MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211509950 · doi:10.1002/celc.202101245

Construction of Hierarchical Flower‐Shaped (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>V<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>/rGO with Enhanced Zinc Storage Performance**

2021· article· en· W3211509950 on OpenAlexaff
Zikang Pan, Qiang Ru, Minghui Zheng, Wengang Xu, Jinlin Wu, Jun Zhang, C. C. Ling, Li Wie

Bibliographic record

VenueChemElectroChem · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
KeywordsMaterials scienceCathodePseudocapacitanceVanadiumGrapheneChemical engineeringAqueous solutionComposite numberConductivityElectrolyteNanotechnologyElectrochemistrySupercapacitorComposite materialElectrodeMetallurgyElectrical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Vanadium‐based cathode materials are being widely investigated in aqueous zinc‐ion batteries (ZIBs) due to their high specific capacity. However, poor cycling stability and low conductivity limit their practical applications. Herein, the hierarchical flower‐shaped (NH 4 ) 2 V 3 O 8 /reduced graphene oxide (denoted as NVO/rGO) composite is designed to harvest high‐efficiency Zn storage. Benefiting from the stable layered structure of NVO, the prominent pseudocapacitance, and excellent conductivity of rGO, the NVO/rGO composite exhibits a high specific capacity of 375.3 mAh g −1 at 0.2 A g −1 , excellent cycling stability of 265.0 mAh g −1 after 3700 cycles at 5.0 A g −1 (capacity retention over 95.3 %), and outstanding rate performance of 263.9 mAh g −1 at 10.0 A g −1 by using traditional coin cells. To further verify the practicability of the NVO/rGO cathode, flexible electrode and xanthan gum electrolyte are adopted to assemble quasi‐solid‐state ZIBs, which exhibit a great specific capacity of 185.0 mAh g −1 at 0.5 A g −1 and good stability under different bending angles with an impressive capacity retention of 92.2 % after cycling. This study illustrates that hierarchical flower‐shaped NVO/rGO has a promising potential as aqueous or quasi‐solid‐state ZIBs cathode and improves the application of vanadium‐based materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemElectroChemSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207