MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211524163 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab196.080

STEM-04. PD-1 INDEPENDENT OF PD-L1 LIGATION PROMOTES GLIOBLASTOMA GROWTH THROUGH THE NFkB PATHWAY

2021· article· en· W3211524163 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Mirzaei, Wee Yong

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlioblastomaCancer researchPD-L1Immune systemStem cellBiologyCell biologyImmunologyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain tumor-initiating cells (BTICs) drive glioblastoma growth through not fully understood mechanisms. Here, we found that a proportion of human and murine BTICs expressed programmed cell death protein (PD-1). Gain- or loss-of-function studies revealed that tumor-intrinsic PD-1 promoted proliferation, and self-renewal of BTICs. Mechanistically, site-directed mutagenesis, RNA sequencing and pharmacological inhibitors implicated SHP-2-mediated activation of NFkB downstream of PD-1 in BTICs. Notably, the tumor-intrinsic promoting effects of PD-1 did not require PD-L1 ligation; thus, the therapeutic blocking antibodies inhibiting PD-1/PD-L1 interaction which failed in glioblastoma trials could not overcome the growth advantage of PD-1 in BTICs. Finally, mice with intracranial Pdcd1 over- or underexpressing BTICs had shorter or longer survival, respectively, and this occurred in mice lacking T and B cells. These findings point to a critical role for PD-1 in BTICs and uncover a non-immune resistance mechanism of GBM patients to PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207