Factors influencing physical activity for less actives youth during Team Pentathlon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude poursuivait trois objectifs : 1) determiner les profils d’evolution de pratique d’activite physique d’eleves « peu actifs » avant ou pendant un Pentathlon en equipe, 2) analyser les caracteristiques identitaires et participatifs (sexe, milieu socio-economique, pratique d’activites physiques) de chaque profil, et 3) identifier les facteurs percus par les eleves comme aidant ou limitant leur pratique. Le programme Pentathlon en equipe a ete implante aupres de 104 jeunes d’ecoles primaires de la region de Quebec. Un questionnaire a ete administre pour recueillir les perceptions des eleves a propos de leur participation au programme. Les resultats ont permis d’identifier que ce sont des facteurs individuels et des caracteristiques du Pentathlon en equipe qui aident le plus les eleves a faire de la pratique d’activites physiques, tandis que ce sont le manque d’equipement et le manque d’engagement qui ont limite la pratique des eleves. Les apports de ce travail sur les facteurs associes aux differents profils d’evolution de pratique ont permis de preciser l’impact de ce type d’intervention aupres des eleves qui participent a ce programme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".