Edades del consentimiento sexual. Activismo gay y sexualidad de los menores en Francia y Quebec (1970-1980)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este articulo se analiza como los movimientos militantes homosexuales de los anos setenta inauguran en Francia y en Quebec una politizacion de la mayoria sexual que fue precursora para una serie de reformas emprendidas mas tarde en los anos ochenta. A comienzos de los setenta, estos movimientos se enfrentaron a un desafio muy similar en ambos paises: la edad de la mayoria sexual, mas elevada para los homosexuales, planteo el problema de la libertad sexual de los menores. En efecto, la historia de los movimientos gays en estos paises sigue una trayectoria paralela. Fundados en estrecha relacion con los movimientos politicos revolucionarios, los movimientos gays se reestructuran a mediados de los anos setenta en torno a reivindicaciones mas especificas, ligadas en particular a la discriminacion legal de los homosexuales con respecto a la edad de la mayoria sexual. En los anos ochenta, se da como resultado nuevas leyes que redefinen casi en simultaneo tanto la mayoria sexual como la violacion. Se dibuja asi un proceso similar en Francia y en Canada: si bien se alcanza una reforma de la mayoria sexual, su principio se reafirma en tanto baluarte contra una nueva figura del peligro, la del pedofilo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".