Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In studies with survival endpoints, it is often of interest to predict the disease risk or survival probabilities in the presence of censored failure times. One commonly used approach is to model the association between the survival outcome and covariates via a semiparametric regression model and use the fitted model for prediction. In this article, we propose two methods to evaluate or predict the survival rates. The first method estimates survival probabilities by matching survival functions, and the second one is based on matching censored quantiles. Unlike traditional regression approaches, the proposed methods directly match the distribution of linear combinations of the covariates to the entire target distribution or parts of it. To accommodate censoring, we adopt a redistribution‐of‐mass technique for the proposed matching censored quantiles. The asymptotic consistency of the resulting estimators is well established. Simulation studies and an example with real data are also provided to further illustrate the practical utilities of our proposals. The proposed methods have been implemented in an R package.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it