Stability analysis of 2‐D discrete and continuous state‐space systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents new stability conditions for two‐dimensional (2‐D) systems in state‐space description. Both discrete and continuous systems are studied. These results are based on the criteria first presented by Huang, De Carlo, Strintzis, Murray, Delsarte, et al. and on the discrete Lyapunov equation with complex elements for 2‐D systems. The stability properties of the Mansour matrix are also used for stability testing in state‐space. Criteria for the VSHP property of 2‐D polynomials are further presented using the continuous Lyapunov equation with complex elements and the stability properties of the Schwarz matrix form. The stability properties of the Schwarz matrix are also used for testing the VSHP property of 2‐D polynomials in state‐space. The proposed new criteria are non‐conservative for the stability analysis of 2‐D discrete and continuous systems and achieve the aim of reducing the original 2‐D problem as much as possible to a set of 1‐D stability tests. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the utility of the proposed conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".