MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211768015 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab748

VT storm in long QT resulting from COVID-19 vaccine allergy treated with epinephrine

2021· article· en· W3211768015 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas R. Slater, K. R. Murphy, Markus B. Sikkel

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaRoyal Jubilee HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Epinephrine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)QT intervalStormVirologyAllergyCardiologyInternal medicineImmunologyMeteorologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 51-year-old lady with congenital prolonged QT syndrome, genotype unknown, with a baseline corrected QT interval (QTc) of ∼470 ms (Panel A), and a secondary prevention single chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (St. Jude Medical) in situ, presented to a community hospital with an anaphylactic reaction shortly after receiving her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Her symptoms were refractory to multiple doses of epinephrine as well as solumedrol, Benadryl, and famotidine, necessitating an epinephrine infusion. Unfortunately, this caused further QT prolongation (Panel B), which precipitated recurrent polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), with two successful antitachycardia pacing (ATP) terminations and one ICD shock. Panel C shows the initiation of the event in the device log with an R-on-T phenomenon triggering polymorphic VT. ATP was unsuccessful (Panel D) resulting in an ICD shock (Panel E), which restored sinus rhythm. Attempts to discontinue her epinephrine infusion were challenged by recurrent anaphylactic symptoms, predominantly hoarse voice, and throat tightening. She was transferred to a tertiary care centre where her device settings were changed to overdrive pace at a rate of 80 bpm (Panel F), shortening the QT interval and resulting in no further significant events or therapies while epinephrine was weaned. Although the allergen here could have been any agent, it is a useful reminder of the dangers of epinephrine in prolonged QT syndrome in the context of widespread vaccination. Although this lady was gene negative, this case is also informative for her future management since in this context she certainly behaved like an LQT1 patient. Funding: The authors report no specific funding related to this article. Conflict of interest: The authors have submitted their declaration which can be found in the article Supplementary Material online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207