MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211776416 · doi:10.1109/joe.2021.3113506

Probabilistic Estimation of Merchant Ship Source Levels in an Uncertain Shallow-Water Environment

2021· article· en· W3211776416 on OpenAlexaff
Dag Tollefsen, William S. Hodgkiss, Stan E. Dosso, Julien Bonnel, David P. Knobles

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsSeabedWaves and shallow waterGeologyNarrowbandBroadbandNoise (video)AcousticsRange (aeronautics)SonarProbabilistic logicComputer scienceOceanographyStatisticsEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The estimation of ship source levels (SSLs) in shallow-water environments can be complicated by sound interaction with the seabed. Uncertainty in seabed properties influences SSL estimates, and it is of interest to mitigate and quantify such effects. This article proposes a probabilistic approach to ship radiated noise recorded on a vertical line array (VLA) of hydrophones to infer SSL and properties of a mud-sand shallow water seabed on the New England Shelf. The approach, trans-dimensional Bayesian marginalization, samples probabilistically over complex spectral source strengths, source depths/ranges, and number of seabed layers and geoacoustic parameters of each layer. The Bayesian information criterion is applied to determine the appropriate number of (point) sources used to describe a ship. Radiated noise due to two merchant ships passing the VLA at beam aspect at 3.2−3.4-km range is considered. The SSL estimates agree well with reference spectra from shallow-water studies on large ensembles of merchant ships. The average SSL uncertainty (in terms of one-half the interquartile range interval) is 3.2 dB/Hz for low-frequency narrowband (20−120 Hz) and 1.8 dB/Hz for broadband noise (190−590 Hz). Seabed layering and geoacoustic parameter estimates agree reasonably well with mud-over-sand seabed models from other inversions in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Oceanic EngineeringSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207