Expanding the clinicopathological spectrum of <scp><i>TGFBR3‐PLAG1</i></scp> rearranged salivary gland neoplasms with myoepithelial differentiation including evidence of high‐grade transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PLAG1 rearrangements have been described as a molecular hallmark of salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma (PA), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CEPA), and myoepithelial carcinoma (MECA). Several fusion partners have been described, however, commonly no further assignment to the aforementioned entities or a morphological prediction can be made based on the knowledge of the fusion partner alone. In contrast, TGFBR3-PLAG1 fusion has been specifically described and characterized as an oncogenic driver in MECA, and less common in MECA ex PA. Here, we describe the clinicopathological features of three TGFBR3-PLAG1 fusion-positive salivary gland neoplasms, all of which arose in the deep lobe of the parotid gland. Histopathology showed high morphological similarities, encompassing encapsulation, a polylobular growth pattern, bland basaloid and oncocytoid cells with myoepithelial differentiation, and a distinct sclerotic background. All cases showed at least limited, unusual foci of minimal invasion into adjacent salivary gland tissue, including one case with ERBB2 (Her2/neu) amplified, TP53 mutated high-grade transformation, and lymph node metastases. Of note, all cases illustrated focal ductal differentiation. Classification remains difficult, as morphological overlaps between myoepithelial-rich cellular PA, myoepithelioma, and MECA were observed. However, evidence of minimal invasion advocates classification as low-grade MECA. This case series further characterizes the spectrum of uncommon cellular myoepithelial neoplasms harboring TGFBR3-PLAG1 fusion, which show recurrent minimal invasion of the adjacent salivary gland tissue, a predilection to the deep lobe of the parotid gland, and potential high-grade transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".