Pengujian efek kualitas dan risiko keamanan pada intensi pembelian makanan dengan mediasi traceability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several consumer considerations in buying and consuming food such as the quality and safety of the food and traceability of the food itself. This study examines the effect of food quality and perception of food risk on purchase intention. We also examine mediating effect of traceability in the influence of quality and safety on consumer purchase intentions. The survey was conducted online to obtain data consisting of 100 fast food consumers. The research hypothesis testing was carried out using SmartPLS statistical software. The results showed food quality and perception of food risk have significant influence on purchase intention. However, there was no mediating effect of traceability in the influence of food quality and safety on consumer purchase intentions. This research theoretically expands the literature in the field of consumer behavior, particularly related to food marketing. The results of this study can practically be used as a basis for formulating food marketing strategies, especially related to steps that can be used to maintain food quality, safety, and traceability as an effort to increase consumer purchase intentions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it