Pelabresib (CPI-0610) Monotherapy in Patients with Myelofibrosis - Update of Clinical and Translational Data from the Ongoing Manifest Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Pelabresib (CPI-0610) is a potent, first-in-class, selective, oral small-molecule inhibitor of bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins which is able to modify the expression of genes involved in nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) signaling in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Here we present results from MANIFEST (NCT02158858), an ongoing, global, open-label Phase 2 study investigating pelabresib monotherapy in patients with advanced MF who are intolerant/refractory to, or ineligible for ruxolitinib (RUX) and typically have very poor prognosis. Methods: Eligibility criteria are MF patients intolerant/refractory to or ineligible for JAKi, Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) risk category of ≥intermediate-2, platelets ≥75 × 10 9/L, and ≥2 symptoms measurable (score ≥1) per Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v4.0. Additional criteria include red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent (TD) per Gale criteria in TD cohort or spleen volume of ≥450 cc by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in non-TD cohort. Patients were enrolled as TD (defined as ≥2 U RBCs/month over 12 wks) and non-TD if TD criteria are not met. The primary endpoint in TD cohort is RBC transfusion independence (TI; defined as no transfusion for ≥12 wks), and ≥35% spleen volume reduction (SVR35) at wk 24 in the non-TD cohort. Secondary endpoints include number of patients with ≥50% total symptom score reduction (TSS50) per MFSAF v4.0 at wk 24, and safety. Additional exploratory endpoints include changes in plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines and bone marrow (BM) morphology/fibrosis. Patients with assessment at wk ≥24 and those discontinuing after wk 12 are included in the analysis of the corresponding endpoint; these were the evaluable patients. Results: As of 29 September 2020, 27 pts were treated in the non-TD cohort for a median duration of 51 wks (2, 147 wks). At wk 24, 30% (7/23) evaluable pts achieved SVR35 (median change: -29%), and 48% (10/21) pts achieved TSS50 (median change: -56%). In the TD cohort, 19 pts were treated for a median duration of 32 wks (5, 78 wks). 21% (3/14) evaluable TD pts achieved RBC TI for ≥12 wks. Updated 24-wk data with a larger data set and new long-term data at 48 wks will be presented. Pt subgroup analyses revealed evidence of activity of pelabresib in a subset of pts who were ineligible to receive RUX, a patient population that generally has few therapeutic options. Clinical benefits observed with pelabresib included achievement of SVR35 and TSS50, improvements in bone marrow fibrosis, and increases in hemoglobin levels. A panel of 68 cytokines, including those known to be nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) targets linked to inflammation and elevated in MF pts, were evaluated in plasma samples obtained at baseline (BL) and during therapy. Cytokines were clustered to show different patterns of change during treatment with pelabresib. Overall, pelabresib significantly reduced plasma levels of several cytokines in RUX naïve or experienced pts (Figure). Cytokine changes with pelabresib in cluster 3 (which includes IL-6, CRP, RANTES, TNFa and IL-18, and is characterized by higher BL values and bigger decreases over time) and in cluster 5 (which includes EPO, TARC, ICAM-1 and IL-8, and is characterized by relatively lower BL values and less profound decreases over time) were more pronounced in RUX-naïve pts. 46 pts were evaluable for safety. The most common hematological treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were thrombocytopenia (30%; ≥Grade 3: 15%) and anemia (15%; ≥Grade 3: 13%). The most common (≥20%) nonhematological TEAEs were nausea (39%; no ≥Grade 3), diarrhea (37%; ≥Grade 3: 4%), dysgeusia and asthenic conditions (30% each; no ≥Grade 3 for either), respiratory tract infections (28%; ≥Grade 3: 2%), cough (26%; no ≥Grade 3) and constipation and weight decrease (22% each; ≥Grade 3: 2% each). Conclusions: Preliminary data suggested pelabresib monotherapy was generally well tolerated and demonstrated signals of clinical activity in MF pts intolerant/refractory to or ineligible for JAKi, who have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kremyanskaya: Astellas: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding. Mascarenhas: Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto: Consultancy; Kartos: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forbius: Research Funding; CTI Biopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prelude: Consultancy. Palandri: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy. Vannucchi: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verstovsek: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy. Harrison: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Galacteo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bose: CTI BioPharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Kartos Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schiller: Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeuti
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".