Community Perceptions Of Rural Tourism Development Based on The Gender Analysis Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This quantitative and descriptive research was conducted using the gender analysis approach to examine community perception regarding tourism development. It seeks to investigate the differences between the perceptions of women and men regarding tourism effects, and to describe what generates this difference? The research took place in seven villages in the northwest region of Tehran—Capital city of Iran—and from a total of 560 households, 158 households were selected as a sample. The questionnaires were completed by 50 women and 108 men who were active in tourism. The results show although women’s involvement in tourism development increased their social connections and knowledge about their society, men are more positive about the economic effects of tourism.My research findings illustrate that men and women do not have the same perception of the impact of tourism, mainly because they have different expectations and not benefited equally. Although tourism has created new job opportunities for women, because of their concentration in the secondary labour market and due to gender differences in access to tourism advantages, tourism development did not affect reducing gender inequality in the area. A comprehensive approach and gender-sensitive rural tourism planning are needed to prevent a gender gap in rural society. Keywords: gender analysis, gender perceptions, Iran, rural tourism, tourism effects, women’s participation________________________ Perceptions communautaires du developpement du tourisme rural sur la base de l'approchede l’analyse de genre ResumeCette recherche quantitative et descriptive a ete menee en utilisant l'approche de l’analyse de genre pour examiner la perception de la communaute concernant le developpement du tourisme. Il cherche a etudier les differences entre les perceptions des femmes et des hommes concernant les effets du tourisme et a decrire ce qui genere cette difference. La recherche a eu lieu dans sept villages de la region nord-ouest de Teheran, capitale de l'Iran, et sur un total de 560 menages, 158 menages ont ete selectionnes comme echantillon. Les questionnaires ont ete remplis par 50 femmes et 108 hommes actifs dans le tourisme. Les resultats montrent que bien que la participation des femmes au developpement du tourisme ait accru leurs liens sociaux et leurs connaissances sur leur societe, les hommes sont plus positifs quant aux effets economiques du tourisme.Les resultats de mes recherches montrent que les hommes et les femmes n'ont pas la meme perception de l'impact du tourisme, principalement parce qu'ils ont des attentes differentes et n'en ont pas beneficie de la meme maniere. Bien que le tourisme ait cree de nouvelles opportunites d'emploi pour les femmes, en raison de leur concentration sur le marche du travail secondaire et en raison des differences entre les sexes dans l'acces aux avantages touristiques, le developpement du tourisme n'a pas affecte la reduction des inegalites entre les sexes dans la region. Une approche globale et une planification du tourisme rural sensible au genre sont necessaires pour eviter un ecart entre les sexes dans la societe rurale. Mots-cles: analyse de genre, perceptions de genre, Iran, tourisme rural, effets du tourisme, participation des femmes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".