MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3212256991 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117045

Two-Year Follow-up of Keynote-087 Study: Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

2018· article· en· W3212256991 on OpenAlexaff
Pier Luigi Zinzani, Robert W. Chen, Hun Ju Lee, Philippe Armand, Nathalie A. Johnson, Pauline Brice, John Radford, Vincent Ribrag, Daniel Molin, Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos, Akihiro Tomita, Bastian von Tresckow, Margaret A. Shipp, Eunhee Kim, Akash Nahar, Arun Balakumaran, Craig H. Moskowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineBrentuximab vedotinInternal medicineOncologyCohortPopulationSalvage therapyRefractory (planetary science)Clinical endpointAutologous stem-cell transplantationChemotherapy regimenTransplantationSurgeryLymphomaChemotherapyClinical trialCancerHodgkin lymphomaImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The near-universal genetic amplification events at 9p24.1 in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) results in overexpression of the programmed death 1 (PD-1) ligands and betrays an unusual dependence on the PD-1 pathway. Inhibition of this pathway by use of pembrolizumab has shown effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL (R/RcHL) in the multicohort KEYNOTE-087 study. This led to FDA approval of pembrolizumab for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients who have refractory cHL or who have relapsed after ≥3 prior lines of therapy. A critical remaining question is the durability of responses, specifically whether a subgroup of patients can have durable remission with PD-1 blockade. Therefore, we present the results for the total population and by cohort, with an additional ~12 months of follow-up from last presentation. Methods: The multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 (NCT02453594) study was conducted to evaluate pembrolizumab in patients with R/R cHL that progressed after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and subsequent brentuximab vedotin (BV) therapy (cohort 1); salvage chemotherapy and BV (cohort 2); or ASCT but not treated with BV after ASCT (cohort 3). Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every 12 weeks per 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphomas. Primary end points were safety and overall response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review in all patients and in each cohort; secondary end points were complete remission rate (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). All patients who received at least 1 dose of pembrolizumab were included in the analyses. Results : At data cutoff (Mar 21, 2018), median follow-up was 27.6 mo (range, 1.0-32.9), and 5 of 210 enrolled patients were still in treatment. Baseline characteristics were previously presented (Chen et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(19):2125-2132). In the total population, ORR was 71.9% (95% CI, 65.3-77.9); CRR, 27.6% (95% CI, 21.7-34.2); partial response (PR), 44.3% (95% CI, 37.5-51.3). Response rates by cohort were as follows: cohort 1 (n=69): ORR: 76.8%; CRR: 26.1%; cohort 2 (n=81): ORR: 66.7%; CRR: 25.9%; cohort 3 (n=60): ORR: 73.3%; CRR: 31.7%. Median DOR was 16.5 mo overall (range 0.0+ to 27.0+; [+, no progressive disease at last assessment]). Of 151 responders, 87 (75.6%) had response ≥6 mo; 61 (58.5%) had response ≥12 mo; 16 (42.5%) had response ≥24 mo; 37 (24.5%) pts had ongoing response. Median DOR by cohort was 22.1 mo in cohort 1, 11.1 mo in cohort 2, and 24.4 mo in cohort 3 (Table). In patients with CR (n=58), median DOR was not reached (NR) in the total population and was 25.0 mo in cohort 1, 19.2 mo in cohort 2, and NR in cohort 3. In patients with PR (n=93), median DOR was 10.9 mo overall, 19.5 mo in cohort 1, 7.9 mo in cohort 2, and 13.9 mo in cohort 3. Median PFS for all patients was 13.7 mo (95% CI, 11.1-17.0) (Table); 24-mo PFS rate was 31.3%. In patients with CR, median PFS was NR in the total population, 27.6 mo in cohort 1, 21.9 mo in cohort 2, and NR in cohort 3 (Table). In patients with PR, median PFS was 13.8 mo in the total population, 22.2 mo in cohort 1, 13.4 mo in cohort 2, and 19.4 mo in cohort 3. Median OS was not reached in the total population or in any cohort; 24-mo OS rate was 90.9% in the overall population, 92.5% in cohort 1; 90.6% in cohort 2, and 89.4% in cohort 3 (Table). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 153 (72.9%) patients; those occurring in ≥10% patients were hypothyroidism (14.3%), pyrexia (11.4%), fatigue (11.0%), and rash (11.0%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 25 (11.9%) pts, most commonly, neutropenia (5 [2.4%]) and diarrhea (3 [1.4%]); none resulted in death. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 14 (6.7%) patients. Conclusions: With more than 2 years of median follow-up, pembrolizumab continued to demonstrate effective antitumor activity with high ORR, durable response, and manageable safety in patients with R/R cHL in 3 cohorts of patients in whom treatment history was different. ORR, DOR, and PFS seemed higher in patients in cohorts 1 and 3 than in cohort 2, in which patients likely had more chemoresistant disease; nonetheless, pembrolizumab is still an effective treatment in this hard-to-treat patient population. Table. Table. Disclosures Zinzani: Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Chen:Affimed: Research Funding; Genentech Inc.: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Johnson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Radford:Pfizer: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ribrag:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; argenX: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria; pharmamar: Other: travel; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel. Molin:Merck & Co., Inc: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Roche Holding AG: Honoraria. Vassilakopoulos:Genesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Von Tresckow:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, Research Funding. Shipp:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Nahar:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Balakumaran:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moskowitz:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→