MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3212333063 · doi:10.25251/skin.5.supp.52

Bimekizumab response maintenance through two years of treatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who responded after 16 weeks: Interim results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial

2021· article· en· W3212333063 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce Strober, Akihiko Asahina, Ulrich Mrowietz, Mark Lebwohl, Peter Foley, Richard G. Langley, Christopher L. Cioffi, Nancy Cross, Maggie Haitian Wang, C. Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaque psoriasisInterimOpen labelMedicinePsoriasisExtension (predicate logic)Internal medicineDermatologyInterim analysisClinical trialSurgeryHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectiveEvaluate maintenance of response rates among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis receiving BKZ who had an initial response (IGA 0/1, BSA ≤1%, PASI 100) at Week 16 of the three phase 3 feeder studies and received continuous Q4W or Q8W BKZ maintenance dosing over two years.• In phase 3 clinical trials, BKZ led to substantial clinical improvements in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with no unexpected safety findings.[2][3][4][5] • Given that psoriasis is a chronic disease, it is important to understand long-term treatment efficacy. Methods• Patients who completed one of three phase 3 studies (BE VIVID: NCT03370133; BE SURE: NCT03412747; BE READY: NCT03410992) could enroll in the BE BRIGHT (NCT03598790) twoyear open-label extension (OLE).[1][2][3] These analyses include patients randomized to BKZ 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) who responded at Week 16 of the feeder study, received BKZ 320 mg Q4W or every 8 weeks (Q8W) maintenance dosing from Week 16, and enrolled in BE BRIGHT (Figure 1).• We report maintenance of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, psoriasis body surface area (BSA) ≤1%, and 100% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100, complete skin clearance) through two years of treatment (OLE Week 48) among Week 16 responders who received continuous BKZ maintenance dosing in the OLE (Q4W/Q4W/Q4W or Q4W/Q8W/Q8W).• Missing data were imputed using modified non-responder imputation (mNRI), non-responder imputation (NRI), and observed case (OC).-mNRI: Multiple imputation was used for missing data, except for patients with missing data following treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy where they were considered non-responders.• Safety over two years was evaluated for all patients who received ≥1 dose of BKZ in the phase 3 feeder studies or the OLE.-Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were coded using MedDRA v19.0.Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) are the incidence of new cases per 100 patient-years (PY). Results• Patient demographics and baseline characteristics for Week 16 responders are reported in Table 1.• 989 patients were initially randomized to BKZ 320 mg Q4W; at Week 16, 87.5% achieved IGA 0/1, 74.9% achieved BSA ≤1%, and 62.7% achieved PASI 100 (NRI).• Among Week 16 IGA 0/1, BSA ≤1%, and PASI 100 responders, respectively, response rates were maintained to OLE Week 48 with both Q4W and Q8W maintenance dosing regimens (Figure 2).• The most common TEAEs (incidence >5%) were nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, and upper respiratory tract infection.No new safety signals were identified in the phase 3 feeder studies or the BE BRIGHT OLE (Table 2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine→Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→French-language works237,207→