Compliance and Sustainability: Brazilian and Portuguese Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atlantic.These are common problems, and it is always inspiring to know that intervention experiences have been verified.The publication now coming to light allows a much larger number of interested people to access the valuable contributions presented at the Coimbra Seminar.Since the world beyond Brazil and Portugal has problems that concern and interest us all, this publication is being released not only in Portuguese but also in English to benefit a larger public with the knowledge of the contributions made.• C LÓV I S D E B A R RO S F I L H O rights, as prerogatives, never a de facto concept.Therefore, I do not have -nor do I intend to have -rights that no one else has, for example, the right to vote, to express myself freely, and to have a decent education, job opportunities, etc.The second implication is difference, respect for the other precisely for what otherness makes different from the selfyour own body, thoughts, beliefs, emotions, way of being.If we differ in religion, sexual orientation, and representations of the perceived or ideal world, there can still be respect.Therefore, respect for others demands that I recognize them as my equals in rights and also as different from me in existence.This implication represents both the deliberate and the succumbing parts of life.After all, no one else interacts with the world as each of us does, in choices, certainly, but also in the misfortunes of chance.Therefore, we are equal in rights -such as voting, preserving property and being married -but different in choices such as the choice of a party or a candidate, the choice to become the owner or to retain ownership of this or that, and the choice to marry this or that person.Equality in rights and difference in choice make us assume that ethics is unique to humans although many other species coexist all the time. Human specificityRousseau exemplified this concept in his Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality among Men in 1755.Cats "do cat things", and pigeons "do pigeon stuff".They do not create, they do not innovate, they do not take risks, they do not improvise, and they do not choose or make decisions; they just live according to the inclinations and propensities dictated to them by nature.Now, humans are neither cats nor pigeons.The understanding of ethics is embedded in this realization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".