Caminhos para o Manejo Agroecológico atraves de participaçao no Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (PNAE) em Santa Catarina, Brasil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agroecology, as a social movement and scientific discipline, applies ecological principles tothe design and management of agricultural systems to improve environmental outcomes andlivelihoods for farmers and rural communities. However, little research to date has assessedthe policy mechanisms that could facilitate increased adoption of agroecological managementpractices. We investigated if and how public food procurement programs that provide financialincentives for organic and agroecological production can mitigate key constraints to agroecologicaltransition. We explored the experience of participants in Brazil’s National School FeedingProgram (PNAE) in Santa Catarina, which offers both a structured market for small-scalefamily farmers and a price premium for certified agroecological production systems. We foundthat the PNAE provides an economic incentive for small-scale farmers to begin an agroecologicaltransition by creating a price-differentiated market that is otherwise absent in the regionalcontext. However, without external network linkages – such as participation in farmers’ associations,cooperatives, and non-governmental agricultural extension programs that supportagroecological practices – the influence of PNAE is limited in stimulating a broader scaling upof agroecological production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it