Transmission of Acute Respiratory Infections during Aerosol Generating Medical Procedures (AGMPs): An updated review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 ABSTRACT Objectives To review the literature from 2011 until March 31 st , 2020 to identify the risk of transmission of ARIs to healthcare workers caring for patients undergoing AGMPs compared with the risk of transmission when caring for patients not undergoing AGMPs. Results Only two prospective cohort studies were identified meeting inclusion criteria. One found that performance or assistance with AGMP during the previous week was significantly associated with symptomatic influenza (adjusted OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.3 to 4.2). The second study found that performance of AGMP was significantly associated with clinical respiratory infections (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.42-5.87, p<0.01), laboratory-confirmed virus or bacteria (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.37-6.22, p=0.01), and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.01-11.02, p=0.05). Further evidence is needed regarding what constitutes an AGMP and the risk of ARI transmission during presumed AGMPs. Organizations need to interpret these findings with caution when establishing AGMP lists requiring airborne precautions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".