MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212567082 · doi:10.29173/mlj1067

The Registered Retirement Savings Protection Act

2009· article· en· W3212567082 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryan Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessActuarial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

n 1 November 2007, a new judgment enforcement exemption came into effect in the Province of Manitoba.The Registered Retirement Savings Protection Act1 ("The RRSP Act"), which received Royal Assent on 7 December 20062, is designed to ensure that Registered Retirement Savings Plan ("RRSP")3 investments of debtors are not subject to the enforcement remedies that would otherwise be available to their creditors.This paper will examine the following:• A general overview of debtor-creditor law in Manitoba and The RRSP Act's place within this regime, • The parties affected by The RRSP Act, • Similar legislation in other jurisdictions and law reform efforts, • The legislative process that occurred to bring The RRSP Act into effect, and • Potential issues that could arise with the implementation of The RRSP Act. II. OVERVIEW OF DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW IN MANITOBA A. Division of PowersWhen examining debtor-creditor law in Canada, it is important to recognize the roles of both the federal government and the provinces and the effect that the 1The Registered Retirement Savings Protection Act, S.M. 2006, c. 29.Proclaimed in force 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207