MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212601849 · doi:10.1002/crso.20152

Soil Test Levels to Guide Nutrient Stewardship: Phosphorus and Potassium Focus for the North‐Central Region

2021· article· en· W3212601849 on OpenAlexaff
John Jones, Tom Bruulsema, Saad Tarik

Bibliographic record

VenueCrops & Soils · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)Nutrient managementSoil fertilityNutrientTest (biology)PhosphorusSoil managementEnvironmental stewardshipAgronomySoil nutrientsEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringEnvironmental resource managementSoil waterPolitical scienceBiologyEcologySoil scienceEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While monitoring soil test levels for essential crop nutrients is most important on the field or subfield scale, assessing trends across broader geographies can indicate the direction of where past and current management practices are leading us. This article discusses the soil fertility status of the U.S., specifically the North‐Central region, informed by the 2020 North American Soil Test Summary, and what can be interpreted to guide nutrient management decisions at different geographical scales. Earn 1 CEU in Nutrient Management by reading the article and taking the quiz at https://bit.ly/3aR26gE . View all CEUs online at https://web.sciencesocieties.org/Learning‐Center/Courses .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrops & SoilsSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207