MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212631917 · doi:10.4000/craup.8850

Eileen Gray’s Jean Désert showroom 217 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, Paris ; marketing design in the 1920s

2021· article· fr· W3212631917 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Benton

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagère · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGray (unit)HonorArtArt historySAINTGrey marketVisual artsCartographyManagementSociologyAdvertisingLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceBusinessEconomicsGeographyInternet privacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Irish designer Eileen Gray (1878-1976) is recognized as one of the foremost artists of the 1920s. Detailed analysis of the accounts of the Jean Désert showroom in Paris, opened by Gray in 1922, adds to our understanding of her approach to design and marketing. The showroom did not only fail due to low turnover but also due to the high fixed costs involved in subsidising the lacquer workshop run by Seizo Sougawara and the rug workshop managed by Evelyn Wyld. The article addresses the following questions: What was the financial viability of the showroom? Who were Gray’s clients? What kinds of items sold best? What does the showroom tell us about Gray’s approach to design? How does her practice differ from that of other designers of the day? What clues do the documents give to understanding Gray’s clients and their social milieu?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagèreSame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207