The Hybrid Pulsed Power Circuit Modeled as a Double-Discharge Circuit for Gas Laser Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long pulse gas lasers utilizing double-discharge circuits are different from the single-short pulse gas lasers in that they do not require all of the desired energy to be deposited into the peaking capacitors prior to ignition of the main gap. Instead, the majority of the energy is held in another capacitor that is then discharged in the form of a longer duration discharge pulse output compared with that of single-short pulse lasers. Extended stability of the discharge is typically achieved by igniting the main gap discharge at higher ignition voltages. Several double-discharge circuit topologies exist in the literature. However, each topology has its own disadvantages primarily centered around the components needed and the resulting complexity. In this article we introduce the application of the new hybrid circuit pulsed power topology as a double-discharge circuit with high ignition voltages. The hybrid circuit pulsed power topology was originally published by the authors of this article in their previous publication titled “A New Hybrid Pulsed Power Circuit Topology for Gas Laser Applications.” The advantage of the hybrid circuit as a double-discharge circuit is that it does not require any special device [e.g., semiconductor opening switch (SOS) diode] and can use commonly available components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".