MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212829390 · doi:10.7185/gold2021.7475

Exotic Mo isotope composition in the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone belt

2021· article· en· W3212829390 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Touboul, Caroline Fitoussi, Jonathan OʼNeil

Bibliographic record

VenueGoldschmidt2021 abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenstone beltIsotopeComposition (language)GeologyGeochemistryArcheanPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The isotopes of Mo, a moderately siderophile element (MSE), can potentially be used as a new tracer of mantle heterogeneities produced as a result of late accretion, i.e. the ~0.5% addition of extraterrestrial materials to the Earth's mantle after core formation, which is most commonly invoked for explaining the high concents of highly siderophile elements (HSE) and their chondritic relative abundances in the present-day mantle [1]. The rationale for such an approach is based upon (1) the observation that most extraterrestrial materials have different Mo isotope compositions compared with the present-day accessible Earth's mantle. Therefore, late accretion is expected to have changed the Mo isotope composition of the Earth's mantle. (2) the evidence for the preservation of early mantle heterogeneities, in particular in archean rocks, such as those from the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt (NGB) (Canada, 3.8 Ga) [2,3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGoldschmidt2021 abstractsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207