MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212886181 · doi:10.1093/brain/awab419

The neuroradiology of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a clinical trial perspective

2021· review· en· W3212886181 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Baldassari, Mike P. Wattjes, Irene Cortese, Achim Gass, Imke Metz, Tarek Yousry, Daniel S. Reich, Nancy Richert

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsNeuroRx Research (Canada)
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathyNeuroradiologyJC virusMedicineClinical trialHistopathologyPathologyNeurologySlow virusLeukoencephalopathyWhite matterMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyVirusVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is an opportunistic infection of the CNS caused by the JC virus, which infects white and grey matter cells and leads to irreversible demyelination and neuroaxonal damage. Brain MRI, in addition to the clinical presentation and demonstration of JC virus DNA either in the CSF or by histopathology, is an important tool in the detection of PML. In clinical practice, standard MRI pulse sequences are utilized for screening, diagnosis and monitoring of PML, but validated imaging-based outcome measures for use in prospective, interventional clinical trials for PML have yet to be established. We review the existing literature regarding the use of MRI and PET in PML and discuss the implications of PML histopathology for neuroradiology. MRI not only demonstrates the localization and extent of PML lesions, but also mirrors the tissue destruction, ongoing viral spread, and resulting inflammation. Finally, we explore the potential for imaging measures to serve as an outcome in PML clinical trials and provide recommendations for current and future imaging outcome measure development in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207