MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212964461

Evaluarea eficacităţii testului real-time PCR în detectarea la naştere a streptococului de grup B comparativ cu cultura clasică

2021· article· ro· W3212964461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mihai Muntean, Doina Bilcă, Consuela Filotti, Alexandra Mileşan, Sabina Gliga, Rodica Ifrim, Janos Kupas, Adina Vanga, Vlăduţ Săsăran, Claudiu Mărginean

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrica şi Ginecologia · 2021
Typearticle
Languagero
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreptococcus agalactiaeGroup BMedicineIncidence (geometry)StreptococcusObstetricsProspective cohort studyGestationPregnancyGynecologyPediatricsInternal medicineBiologyBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) – or Streptococcus agalactiae (a Gram-positive bacterium) – is responsible for some neonatal conditions or even neonatal death. Data from some studies and some European recommendations call into question the intrapartum screening, due to the existence of false positive/negative cases at the screening from 35-37 weeks of gestation. In this situation, it is recommended to use in the labor ward a point-of-care system based on real-time molecular PCR technology, which allows to obtain fast and high accuracy results. Materials and method. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the real-time PCR test in the intrapartum detection of the vaginal colonization of group B Streptococcus, we conducted a prospective study by evaluating 100 intrapartum pregnant women hospitalized in the Nova Vita Hospital Maternity, using the GBS DS kit and the Revogene system produced by GenePOC Canada, whose results we compared with those obtained through traditional culture. Results. At the end of the study, 83 pregnant women were eligible for evaluation. The incidence of vaginal group B Streptococcus at 35-37 weeks detected by traditional culture was 14.63%. The intrapartum incidence of GBS presence detected by traditional culture was 7.31% (six cases), and by real-time PCR (Revogene system), it was 9.75% (eight cases), of which four new cases detected intrapartum (4.87%). The sensitivity of the PCR test at birth was 83.33%, the specificity was 96.05% (95% CI; 88.9-99.2) and AUC was 89.7% (95% CI; 81-95.3). Conclusions. Point-of-care systems, such as Revogene system, can be easily used in the labor ward, the results being available in a short period (70 minutes), and real-time PCR molecular technology (NAAT) can detect more patients colonized with group B Streptococcus intrapartum than classical culture and, thus, the medical staff can prevent the complications of group B Streptococcus infection in the newborn and mother.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrica şi GinecologiaSame topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207