MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213046821 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-bsg.18

OWE-6 Multicentre evaluation of second line therapies in primary biliary cholangitis: UK experience

2021· article· en· W3213046821 on OpenAlexaff
Nadir Abbas, Emma Culver, Douglas Thorburn, Neil Halliday, Hannah Crothers, Jessica Dyson, April Phaw, Richard Aspinall, Salim I. Khakoo, Yiannis Kallis, Belinda Smith, Imran Patanwala, Anne McCune, Vinod S. Hegade, Chenchu Chimakurthi, Rebecca Jones, Michael Orrell, George Mells, David G. Jones, Gideon M. Hirschfield, Palak Trivedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineObeticholic acidUrsodeoxycholic acidGastroenterologyBilirubinFenofibrateReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of second-line therapies in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), with regards Obeticholic acid (OCA) and non-licensed therapy (fibric acid derivatives; FA) across a nationwide cohort of patients (pts). Method Efficacy and safety data was accrued from 12 centres across the UK. Biochemical parameters are presented relative to the upper limit of normal (ULN). Results Between August 2017-March 2020 we captured data from 457 PBC pts who initiated second-line therapy (n = 349 OCA, 48 bezafibrate, 60 fenofibrate). The OCA group manifest greater ALP values at baseline than those initiating FA therapy (2.9 v 2.3 x ULN; P = 0.001), with a greater proportion being ursodeoxycholic acid non-responders (63.5% vs 45.4%; P = 0.001), cirrhotic (16.5% v 8.3%; p = 0.03), or having an abnormal bilirubin (22.1% v 12%; p = 0.02). At 12mo, the magnitude of ALP reduction was 29.3% and 56.7% in the OCA and FA groups (p < 0.001 between groups), with 2% and 49% of pts attaining normal ALP values (Figure 1). By contrast, 50.8% and 28.1% attained a normal ALT at 12mo (Figure 1). Moreover, 37.3% of the OCA group who had an abnormal bilirubin at baseline normalised values at 12mo (p < 0.05) - bilirubin values did not change significantly in the FA group. 12mo biochemical response rates (Paris criteria) were 71.1% and 83.1% under OCA and FA therapy, respectively (p = 0.141 between groups). In patients with cirrhosis under OCA treatment (n=57), significant reduction in ALP, ALT and bilirubin were observed at 12 mo (p<0.05 for all comparisons), with 61.5% attaining full biochemical response. The number of patients with an elevated bilirubin and/or cirrhosis in the FA group was too small to permit subgroup analysis therein. Escalation in anti-pruritus therapy was observed in 26.1% and 23.2% of pts (P = n.s.). Mild-moderate elevations in liver biochemistry (DILIN classification) were reported in 4.6% and 12.0% of pts under OCA and FA therapy (p < 0.05). Conclusion In this non-randomised study, the magnitude of ALP reduction was greater with FA derivatives, whereas rates of ALT and bilirubin normalisation were more pronounced under OCA. The need for anti-pruritus treatment is similar between groups, although putative rates of drug-induced liver injury appear greater under FA therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207