MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213068741 · doi:10.1002/fee.2437

The essential carbon service provided by northern peatlands

2021· review· en· W3213068741 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lorna I. Harris, Karen Richardson, Kelly Ann Bona, Scott J. Davidson, Sarah A. Finkelstein, Michelle Garneau, Jim McLaughlin, Felix Nwaishi, David Olefeldt, Maara Packalen, Nigel T. Roulet, F. Meg Southee, Maria Strack, Kara L. Webster, SOPHIE WILKINSON, Justina C. Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsWildlife Conservation Society CanadaMcGill UniversityMcMaster UniversityConcordia UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalMinistry of Natural Resources and ForestryOntario Forest Research InstituteCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of TorontoMount Royal UniversityUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesUniversity of AlbertaGeorge Cedric Metcalf Charitable Foundation
KeywordsPeatEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasClimate changeSoil carbonCarbon sinkGlobal warmingCarbon cycleSink (geography)EcosystemEnvironmental protectionEcologyGeographySoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern peatlands have cooled the global climate by accumulating large quantities of soil carbon (C) over thousands of years. Maintaining the C sink function of these peatlands and their immense long‐term soil C stores is critical for achieving net‐zero global carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions by 2050 to mitigate climate warming. One‐quarter of the world’s northern peatlands are in Canada, with these mostly intact ecosystems providing a global C service that is increasingly recognized as a critical part of nature‐based solutions to combat climate change. However, land‐use change and other disturbances threaten these globally important stores of “irrecoverable C” (that is, soil C lost to disturbance that will take centuries to recover). Inadequate policy safeguards to avoid conversion and degradation, and the limited quantification and reporting of peatland greenhouse‐gas emissions and removals, increase the vulnerability of these peatlands. Targeted policies from local to global scales will be needed for improved decision making and incentivizing long‐term C management of northern peatlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207