Differential biomechanics in resistance arteries of male compared with female Dahl hypertensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increase in vascular stiffness is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and is likely sex-specific. METHOD: Our objectives were to compare structural and functional alterations in small resistance arteries as related to vascular stiffness from Dahl salt-sensitive male and female rats (n = 8, mean ± s.e.m.). RESULTS: Arterial blood pressure and pulse wave velocity were significantly (P < 0.05) elevated in males (161 ± 3 mmHg; 6.4 ± 0.2 m/s) and females (147 ± 2 mmHg; 5.5 ± 0.1 m/s) on a high (H) salt compared with regular (R) diets but were significantly higher in males (H) than in all others. Significant increases in collagen and smooth muscle cell areas were evident in ultrastructure of mesenteric arteries of hypertensive males compared to normotensive or corresponding females. There were no significant differences in composite Young's modulus (CYM) between groups. Vasoconstriction resulted in significantly higher CYM in male (H: 8.6 ± 1 KPa) than R (4.5 ± 0.8 KPa), and the corresponding females (H: 5.6 ± 0.6 KPa and R: 5 ± 0.9 KPa). In contrast, vasodilation significantly reduced CYM in the male groups (H: 2.5 ± 0.4 KPa and R: 2.7 ± 0.5 KPa) compared with the corresponding values in females (H: 4.2 ± 0.6 KPa and R: 5 ± 0.5 KPa). Moreover, the slope of pressure-volume curves revealed significantly greater distended vascular compliance in male H than R, and the corresponding females. CONCLUSION: Our findings are supportive of a link between high salt intake and elevated blood pressure as being sex specific, likely involving sex-dependent changes in ultrastructure of the vessels, which ultimately may alter the biomechanics, and thus, the haemodynamic functions of both macro-circulation and micro-circulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".