Protocole de prise en charge clinique par application de fluorure diamine d’argent en odontologie pédiatrique à l’hôpital Bretonneau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De plus en plus d’enfants polycarieux sont refuses dans les cabinets. Parmi les solutions pour traiter les lesions carieuses dentinaires, le Fluorure Diamine d’Argent (FDA) est utilise aux Etats-Unis ou au Canada. En effet, le FDA, par sa composition en fluor hautement concentre et en argent, est un agent introduit dans de nombreux pays pour arreter la progression des lesions carieuses actives dentinaires sans exposition pulpaire. Son application est facile, rapide, peu onereuse et ne necessite ni anesthesie, ni fraisage. Cet outil therapeutique s’inscrit donc dans une demarche d’Atraumatic Restorative Treatment et est donc particulierement indique pour les enfants non cooperants, en tres bas âge, presentant un risque carieux eleve. Son principal inconvenient reside dans la coloration noire, qu’il laisse sur la lesion carieuse. Pour pallier ce deficit esthetique, il est possible de recouvrir la lesion carieuse d’un soin restaurateur conventionnel, comme un ciment verre ionomere : c’est la technique SMART (Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique). Ce produit n’est utilise en France que pour traiter les sensibilites dentinaires. Un protocole pour le traitement par FDA est propose a l’hopital Bretonneau.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".