MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213203351 · doi:10.1115/imece2008-67763

Modelling MEMS Resonators Past Pull-In

2008· article· en· W3213203351 on OpenAlexaff
C. P. Vyasarayani, Eihab Abdel‐Rahman, John McPhee, Stephen Birkett

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 13: Nano-Manufacturing Technology; and Micro and Nano Systems, Parts A and B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalerkin methodNonlinear systemMicroelectromechanical systemsPartial differential equationDamperBeam (structure)ResonatorOrdinary differential equationDifferential equationTimoshenko beam theoryControl theory (sociology)MechanicsPhysicsMathematical analysisMathematicsComputer scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a mathematical model of an electrostatic MEMS beam undergoing impact with a stationary electrode subsequent to pull-in. We model the contact between the beam and the substrate using a nonlinear foundation of springs and dampers. The system partial differential equation (PDE) is converted into coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) using the Galerkin method. A numerical solution is obtained by treating all nonlinear terms as external forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 13: Nano-Manufacturing Technology; and Micro and Nano Systems, Parts A and BSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207