MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213243475

A paisagem sonora na obra de Charles Kiefer: um estudo acerca de O pêndulo do relógio, Valsa para Bruno Stein e a Face do abismo.

2020· dissertation· pt· W3213243475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Viviane Aparecida Pandolfo Debortolli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian cultural history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esse estudo e uma tentativa de evidenciar a presenca e a importância da paisagem sonora em tres livros do escritor Charles Kiefer. Termo proveniente dos estudos da acustica, a paisagem sonora esta associada a todos os sons presentes em dado ambiente. Em extensao, no texto literario ficcional ela esta associada aos sons que compoe a atmosfera nas narrativas. O Pendulo do Relogio (1984), Valsa para Bruno Stein (1986) e A Face do Abismo (1988) formam o corpus de analise que tem como principal alicerce teorico os textos do compositor, educador e musicologista Murray Schafer, e sua transposicao para a literatura a partir de estudos de Gerson Werlang (2011). O trabalho foi dividido em quatro capitulos, cujos tres primeiros sao dedicados para analise especifica de cada um dos livros. A analise segue a mesma ordem da publicacao: no primeiro, sao evidenciados os aspectos sonoros e a maneira como a sonoridade impacta nas acoes do protagonista; o segundo parte do principio de que o livro esta estruturado no mesmo compasso da valsa e a partir desse pressuposto percorre os vestigios desta e de outras artes no texto, especialmente atraves da atmosfera musical; o terceiro capitulo elabora um breve percurso das mudancas sonoras ocorridas em mais de oitenta anos no local em que a historia se desenvolve. O ultimo capitulo traca um panorama de representacoes sonoras que se repetem ao longo dos tres livros, elucidando as particularidades de cada uma nas historias, ou seja, a maneira como elas se apresentam em cada um dos textos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrazilian cultural history and politicsFrench-language works237,207