MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213281663 · doi:10.1002/chem.202103729

Noble‐Gas Difluoride Complexes of MOF<sub>4</sub> (M=Mo, W); Syntheses, Structures and Bonding of NgF<sub>2</sub> ⋅ MOF<sub>4</sub> and XeF<sub>2</sub> ⋅ 2MOF<sub>4</sub> (Ng=Kr, Xe)

2021· article· en· W3213281663 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark R. Bortolus, Hélène P. A. Mercier, David S. Brock, Gary J. Schrobilgen

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographyXenon difluorideBond lengthAnhydrousCrystal structureIonInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The NgF 2 ⋅ MOF 4 (Ng=Kr, Xe; M=Mo, W) and XeF 2 ⋅ 2MOF 4 complexes were synthesized in anhydrous HF (aHF) solvent and melts, respectively. Their single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD) structures show NgF 2 ⋅ MOF 4 and XeF 2 ⋅ 2MOF 4 have F t −Ng−F b ‐ ‐ ‐M arrangements, in which the NgF 2 ligands coordinate to MOF 4 through Ng−F b ‐ ‐ ‐M bridges. The XeF 2 ligands of XeF 2 ⋅ 2MOF 4 also coordinate to F 3 OM−F b ’‐ ‐ ‐M'OF 4 moieties through Xe−F b ‐ ‐ ‐M bridges to form F t −Xe−F b ‐ ‐ ‐M(OF 3 )−F b ’‐ ‐ ‐M'OF 4 , where XeF 2 coordinates trans to the M=O bond and F b ’ coordinates trans to the M’=O bond. The Ng−F t , Ng−F b , and M‐ ‐ ‐F b bond lengths of NgF 2 ⋅ n MOF 4 are consistent with MOF 4 and F 3 OM−F b ’‐ ‐ ‐M'OF 4 fluoride‐ion affinity trends: CrOF 4 &lt;MoOF 4 &lt;WOF 4 ≈F 3 OMo−F b ’‐ ‐ ‐Mo'OF 4 &lt;F 3 OW−F b ’‐ ‐ ‐W'OF 4 . The [‐ ‐(F 4 OMo)( μ 3 ‐F)H‐ ‐ ‐( μ ‐F)H‐ ‐] ∞ solvate was also synthesized in aHF and characterized by SCXRD. Quantum‐chemical calculations show the M‐ ‐ ‐F b bonds of NgF 2 ⋅ MOF 4 and XeF 2 ⋅ 2MOF 4 are predominantly electrostatic, σ‐hole type bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207