MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213288673 · doi:10.3233/jpd-212796

Sleep Disorders and Future Diagnosis of Parkinsonism: A Prospective Study Using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

2021· article· en· W3213288673 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parkinson s Disease · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLongitudinal studyProspective cohort studyParkinsonismSleep (system call)Parkinson's diseaseRestless legs syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Earlier detection of parkinsonism, specifically during its prodromal stage, may be key to preventing its progression. Previous studies have produced contradictory results on the association between sleep symptoms and prodromal parkinsonism. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective study within the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) to determine whether self-reported symptoms of insomnia, somnolence, apnea, and restless legs syndrome predate the diagnosis of parkinsonism after three years of follow-up. METHODS: At baseline, amongst other information, participants completed a questionnaire for difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, daytime somnolence, snoring or stopping breathing during sleep, and symptoms of restless legs syndrome. After 3 years of follow-up, baseline responses from participants who self-reported a new diagnosis of parkinsonism (cases) were compared to those who did not (controls). For each case, 10 controls were individually matched by age, sex, education, BMI, caffeine, smoking, and alcohol. Binary unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between sleep symptoms and new-onset parkinsonism, adjusting for age, sex, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol, and caffeine. RESULTS: We identified 58 incident-parkinsonism cases and 580 matched controls (65.5%male, mean age = 69.60, SD = 8.0). Baseline symptoms of sleep-onset insomnia (12.1%vs. 13.0%, Adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.87[0.32,2.33]), sleep-maintenance insomnia (24.1%vs. 20.2%, AOR = 1.01[0.46,2.20]), daytime somnolence (8.6%vs. 7.4%, AOR = 1.11[0.37,3.39]), obstructive sleep apnea (27.3%vs. 26.2%, AOR = 0.84[0.40,1.79]), and restless leg syndrome (20.6%vs. 9.9%, AOR = 1.34[0.42,4.25]) were similar among those who developed parkinsonism and those who did not. CONCLUSION: Symptoms of insomnia, somnolence, apnea, and restless legs did not predate a new diagnosis of parkinsonism over 3 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Parkinson s DiseaseSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207