Uveal Melanoma and Paraneoplastic Perivascular Dermal Melanocytic Proliferation in the Setting of Bilateral Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation: The Potential Role of the Hepatocyte Growth Factor/c-Met Axis in Their Pathogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two patients, with non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab, developed bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) with interesting histopathological features. The first patient developed a right ciliary body mass concurrently with BDUMP. The globe was enucleated. The ciliary body mass was a mitotically active epithelioid uveal melanoma, invading the trabecular meshwork and peripheral corneal stroma, with over 90% of the cells expressing Cyclin D1 protein. The melanoma showed no chromosome 3 or 8 changes. The background uvea showed diffuse, bland spindle cell melanocytic proliferation with much lower Cyclin D1 expression (around 10%). In the choroid, this population was punctuated by islands of pigmented epithelioid cells, some of which were necrotic. All these islands expressed a high level of Cyclin D1, and some islands expressed nuclear preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME). The ciliary body mass, epithelioid cell islands, and the BDUMP all expressed c-Met (the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor [HGF]). The features were those of ciliary body melanoma and choroidal melanoma "tumorlets," developing on a background of BDUMP. The second patient developed bilateral periocular skin pigmentation following a diagnosis of BDUMP, which when biopsied, showed dermal islands of paraneoplastic perivascular melanocytic cell proliferation. These cells also expressed c-Met protein. These observations implicate the HGF/c-Met axis in the pathogenesis of BDUMP, the uveal melanomas in the ciliary body and choroid in the first patient and the paraneoplastic dermal melanocytic proliferation in the second patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".