MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Acute Interleukin‐6 Injection Influences Key Enzymes Involved in Amyloid Precursor Protein Processing in C57BL/6J Mice

2021· article· en· W3213459868 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel M. Marko, Michael S. Finch, L Castellani, Willem T. Peppler, David C. Wright, Rebecca E. K. MacPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmyloid precursor proteinAmyloid precursor protein secretaseADAM10HippocampusAmyloid betaChemistryEndocrinologyBETA (programming language)Internal medicineAmyloid (mycology)MedicineEnzymePharmacologyAlzheimer's diseaseBiochemistryPathologyDiseaseMetalloproteinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Amyloid‐beta plaques are a hallmark feature of Alzheimer's disease and are the product of aggregated amyloid‐beta peptides. These peptides originate from amyloid precursor protein (APP) which is cleaved by beta secretase (BACE1), a key enzyme in the amyloidogenic cascade. Cleavage of APP by alpha secretase (ADAM10) however, does not result in amyloid‐beta peptides and is a key enzyme in the non‐amyloidogenic cascade. It is widely accepted that exercise reduces amyloid‐beta production and plaque build‐up in the brain, although it is unclear how exercise may be driving this observation. Interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) is an exercise induced cytokine and recent work in this area has demonstrated a role for acute exercise induced IL‐6 in tissues such as muscle, adipose, and liver, however the role of acute IL‐6 in the brain remains ill defined. The purpose of this study is to investigate if acute IL‐6 injection will modulate key enzymes involved in APP processing, namely BACE1 and ADAM10. It is hypothesized that acute IL‐6 injection will result in a shift towards the non‐amyloidogenic processing of APP. Methods Male 10‐week‐old C57BL/6J mice were intraperitoneally injected with a weight‐adjusted dose of recombinant murine IL‐6 (3ng/g body mass) or an equivalent volume of saline. Brain tissue was acquired 15 minutes post‐injection and the pre‐frontal cortex and hippocampus regions were dissected. Results Acute IL‐6 injection resulted in lower BACE1 activity in both the cortex (p=0.011) and the hippocampus (p=0.027) compared to the saline injected group. This was accompanied by lower BACE1 (p=0.007) and sAPPb(p=0.019) protein content in the hippocampus of mice injected with IL‐6. No differences for BACE1 or sAPPb were observed in the cortex. ADAM10 activity was higher with IL‐6 injection compared to saline in the hippocampus (p=0.018) and the cortex (p=0.055). A change in ADAM10 protein content was also observed with the ratio of pro to mature ADAM10 being higher in the cortex (p=0.033) of the IL‐6 injected mice as compared to the saline injected control. Similarly, both pro (p=0.017) and mature (p=0.035) ADAM10 protein content were lower in the hippocampus of the IL‐6 injected mice as compared to the saline injected control. Conclusions These results demonstrate that acute IL‐6 modulates important enzymes involved in APP processing; pushing the cascade towards the non‐amyloidogenic arm. This work further highlights regional brain differences in response to acute IL‐6 and extends our knowledge of the function of acute IL‐6 as a signalling molecule in the brain. Future work should determine if exercise induced IL‐6 is in fact the main mediator of non‐amyloidogenic APP processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→