Compliance with 24-hour movement recommendations and health in university students during COVID-19 confinement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: i) examine the proportion of university students who meet Canadian 24- hour movement guidelines (Sleep + Screen + Physical Activity) during COVID-19 lockdown;ii) determine the physical and mental health risks associated with non-adherence with Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines. Method: a convenience sample of 98 university students (64 boys and 34 girls), aged 18-25 years, attending the Sports Science degree at University of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal, were include. Self-reported physical activity was measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), screen time was assessed with two questions reporting the total of hours and minutes, per weekday or weekend, the students spend watching videos and playing video games, as well as the duration and quality of sleep during the weekdays or on weekends. Results: only 30.6% of the students meet the guidelines for sleep plus physical activity and sedentary behavior. Multivariate logistic regression shows that the variables associated with non-compliance with any of the recommendations are: father's professional status, unemployed or lay-off (OR=10.412, 95% CI: 1.256-86.325), poor and average health perception (OR=24.213, 95%CI: 1.323-443.074) and the quality of sleep, who never and sometimes sleeps well (OR=8.896, 95%CI: 1.807-43.788). Conclusion: students who did not meet with the guidelines were at higher risk of having disturbed sleep and lower self-perception of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".