MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213649798 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v33i2.5646

A CJSAE Editors’ Reflective Dialogue

2021· article· en· W3213649798 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Robert C. Mizzi, Nancy Taber, Leona M. English, Donovan Plumb, Scott MacPhail

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityBrock UniversityMount Saint Vincent UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationAdult educationPublicationSociologyMedia studiesPedagogyPolitical scienceCommunicationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five editors reflect on their experiences as being editors of the Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education (CJSAE). One thread that emerges from this conversation is that leading the journal requires a broad effort involving many people who are deeply committed to academic work and social change. A second thread is that the CJSAE does more than publish articles. It builds community, provides a vital knowledge resource, and advances adult education and social development in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult EducationSame topicAdult and Continuing Education TopicsFrench-language works237,207