MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213650636 · doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.1993898

Leading with Digital Technologies Governance in the State-Owned Enterprises

2021· article· en· W3213650636 on OpenAlex
Walter Amedzro St‐Hilaire

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Public Administration · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndogeneityCorporate governanceBusinessData governancePanel dataScale (ratio)Knowledge managementRisk governanceRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceFinanceMarketingEconomicsEconometricsData quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By sharing novel research into the practical implications of large-scale digital records, this study aims to analyze the advanced impact of protective digital technologies strategies on state-owned enterprise governance. The study used panel data fixed effect regression model for analyzing the advanced impact of protective data strategies on digital-risk governance. Furthermore, to analyze the persistence of digital-risk and address the endogeneity concern, a dynamic panel model is used, and the results are estimated using GMM technique. This study shows that the protective data strategies are helpful in reducing digital-risk and therefore state-owned enterprises can reduce their digital-risk exposure by adopting innovative record practices. To the best of the author’s knowledge no prior study analyzes the impact of protective data strategies on the digital-risk governance. Therefore, the current research provides a significant contribution in the enterprise information literature regarding digital records and digital-risk governance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it