Re‐Evaluation of Large Martian Ripples in Gale Crater: Granulometric Evidence for an Impact Mechanism and Terrestrial Analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mars hosts three scales of superimposed aeolian bedforms: small decimeter‐scale impact ripples, large meter‐scale ripples, and dunes. The formation mechanism for large meter‐scale ripples is enigmatic and debated. This debate is largely informed by two questions: (a) Are large ripples similar to any features on Earth? and (b) Do they have the same grain size distribution as dunes and impact ripples? We address these questions using a novel digitizing approach to produce the largest known data set of Mars ripple sand grain size to date. We find a distinction between the grain size distributions of small ripples and large ripples and suggest that analogous bedforms are found on Earth. Despite an inability to perform rigorous sedimentology on Mars, results help resolve outstanding questions in bedform physics and support a hypothesis that aeolian ripples on Mars develop by a terrestrially analogous impact mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".