El discurso sindical ante la nueva gestión pública en el sistema educativo de Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur la nature du discours des syndicats d’enseignants face a la nouvelle gestion publique (NGP) dans le systeme educatif quebecois. Il situe le discours syndical de maniere transversale en analysant comment il integre et faconne differents lieux communs (categories cognitives, theories causales, topiques privilegiees) partages par la plupart des parties prenantes s’exprimant sur la NGP en education dans les medias ou la scene politique institutionnelle. Il propose une analyse de contenu des discours de ces acteurs syndicaux en tant qu’action dans le processus de concertation politique lie a la NGP en education et etudie leurs interventions en commission parlementaire. L’article montre que leur action dans ce forum a, au-dela des oppositions visibles, conforte la trajectoire neo-statiste imprimee a la NGP de l’education au Quebec. L’analyse du discours revele que les acteurs syndicaux se sont largement distancies des acteurs gouvernementaux et des principales autorites educatives face a la gestion axee sur les resultats. De facon paradoxale, le discours syndical et la dialectique des recits d’action publique lors des audiences parlementaires ont contribue a renforcer la voie neo-statiste du nouveau management public quebecois, contre une voie plus neoliberale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".