<scp>SARS</scp> Cov‐2 vaccination induces de novo <scp>donor‐specific HLA</scp> antibodies in a renal transplant patient on waiting list: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability of COVID-19 vaccination to induce anti-HLA antibodies (Abs) formation in renal transplant candidates is not well studied. A 42-year-old man on a renal transplant waitlist, with no sensitization history, was tested for DSA before and after COVID-19 vaccination. Patient has consistently tested negative for COVID-19 virus. Eighteen days after receiving first dose of mRNA-based vaccine, flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) was strongly positive with de novo donor-specific Ab (dnDSA) against B57 and de novo non-DSA against B58. Before vaccination, preliminary FCXM was negative with no anti-HLA Abs. This event prompted the transplant team to cancel the surgery. COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with anti-HLA Abs formation in renal patients on waitlists that could affect future transplantability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".