Dataset of functional connectivity during cognitive control for an adult lifespan sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We provide functional connectivity matrices generated during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during different tasks of cognitive control in healthy aging adults. These data can be used to replicate the primary results from the related manuscript: Reconfiguration and dedifferentiation of functional networks during cognitive control across the adult lifespan (Rieck et al., 2021). One-hundred-forty-four participants (ages 20–86) were scanned on a Siemens 3T MRI scanner while they were completing tasks to measure functional activity during inhibition, initiation, shifting, and working memory. Estimates of functional connectivity (quantified with timeseries correlations) between different brain regions were computed using three different brain atlases: Schaefer 100 parcel 17 network atlas (Schaefer et al., 2018; Yeo et al., 2011), Power 229 node 10 network atlas (Power et al., 2011), and Schaefer 200 parcel 17 network atlas (Schaefer et al., 2018; Yeo et al., 2011). The resulting functional connectivity correlation matrices are provided as text files with this article. Cov-STATIS (Abdi et al., 2012; a multi-table multivariate statistical technique; https://github.com/HerveAbdi/DistatisR) was used to examine similarity between functional connectivity during the different domains of cognitive control. The effect of aging on these functional connectivity patterns was also examined by computing measures of “task differentiation” and “network segregation.” This dataset also provides supplemental analyses from the related manuscript (Rieck et al., 2021) to replicate the primary age findings with additional brain atlases. Cognitive neuroscience researchers can benefit from these data by further investigating the age effects on functional connectivity during tasks of cognitive control, in addition to examining the impact of different brain atlases on functional connectivity estimates. These data can also be used for the development of other multi-table and network-based statistical methods in functional neuroimaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.079 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".