MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213903173 · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.11.011

Dichotomous effects of cellular expression of STAT3 on tumor growth of HNSCC

2021· article· en· W3213903173 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas E. Bickett, Michael W. Knitz, Miles Piper, Ayman Oweida, Jacob Gadwa, Laurel B. Darragh, Diemmy Nguyen, Shilpa Bhatia, Shiv Bhuvane, Andy V. Phan, Benjamin Van Court, Sophia Corbo, Tiffany Pham, Alexander L. Dent, Laurel Lenz, Sana D. Karam

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteRocheAstraZeneca
KeywordsTumor microenvironmentHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaCancer researchBiologyImmune systemSTAT3Cancer cellCell growthCancerCytokineImmunologySignal transductionCell biologyHead and neck cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STAT3 signaling has been shown to regulate cellular function and cytokine production in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Within the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) TME, we previously showed that therapeutic targeting of STAT3 in combination with radiation resulted in improved tumor growth delay. However, given the independent regulatory effects STAT3 has on anti-tumor immunity, we aimed to decipher the effects of individually targeting STAT3 in the cancer cell, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and natural killer (NK) cell compartments in driving tumor growth and resistance to therapy in HNSCCs. We utilized a CRISPR knockout system for genetic deletion of STAT3 within the cancer cell as well as two genetic knockout mouse models, FoxP3-Cre/STAT3 fl and NKp46-Cre/STAT3 fl, for Tregs and NK cell targeting, respectively. Our data revealed differences in development of resistance to treatment with STAT3 CRISPR knockout in the cancer cell, driven by differential recruitment of immune cells. Knockout of STAT3 in Tregs overcomes this resistance and results in Treg reprogramming and recruitment and activation of antigen-presenting cells. In contrast, knockout of STAT3 in the NK cell compartment results in NK cell inactivation and acceleration of tumor growth. These data underscore the complex interplay between the cancer cell and the immune TME and carry significant implications for drug targeting and design of combination approaches in HNSCCs. STAT3 signaling has been shown to regulate cellular function and cytokine production in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Within the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) TME, we previously showed that therapeutic targeting of STAT3 in combination with radiation resulted in improved tumor growth delay. However, given the independent regulatory effects STAT3 has on anti-tumor immunity, we aimed to decipher the effects of individually targeting STAT3 in the cancer cell, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and natural killer (NK) cell compartments in driving tumor growth and resistance to therapy in HNSCCs. We utilized a CRISPR knockout system for genetic deletion of STAT3 within the cancer cell as well as two genetic knockout mouse models, FoxP3-Cre/STAT3 fl and NKp46-Cre/STAT3 fl, for Tregs and NK cell targeting, respectively. Our data revealed differences in development of resistance to treatment with STAT3 CRISPR knockout in the cancer cell, driven by differential recruitment of immune cells. Knockout of STAT3 in Tregs overcomes this resistance and results in Treg reprogramming and recruitment and activation of antigen-presenting cells. In contrast, knockout of STAT3 in the NK cell compartment results in NK cell inactivation and acceleration of tumor growth. These data underscore the complex interplay between the cancer cell and the immune TME and carry significant implications for drug targeting and design of combination approaches in HNSCCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207