ENSO Predictability over the Past 137 Years Based on a CESM Ensemble Prediction System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, we conducted an ensemble retrospective prediction from 1881 to 2017 using the Community Earth System Model to evaluate El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) predictability and its variability on different time scales. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of ENSO predictability using a long-term ensemble hindcast with a complicated coupled general circulation model (CGCM). Our results indicate that both the dispersion component (DC) and signal component (SC) contribute to the interannual variation of ENSO predictability (measured by relative entropy). Specifically, the SC is more important for ENSO events, whereas the DC is of comparable importance for short lead times and in weak ENSO signal years. The SC dominates the seasonal variation of ENSO predictability, and an abrupt decrease in signal intensity results in the spring predictability barrier feature of ENSO. At the interdecadal scale, the SC controls the variability of ENSO predictability, while the magnitude of ENSO predictability is determined by the DC. The seasonal and interdecadal variations of ENSO predictability in the CGCM are generally consistent with results based on intermediate complexity and hybrid coupled models. However, the DC has a greater contribution in the CGCM than that in the intermediate complexity and hybrid coupled models. Significance Statement El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a prominent interannual signal in the global climate system with widespread climatic influence. Our current understanding of ENSO predictability is based mainly on long-term retrospective forecasts obtained from intermediate complexity and hybrid coupled models. Compared with those models, complicated coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) include more realistic physical processes and have the potential to reproduce the ENSO complexity. However, hindcast studies based on CGCMs have only focused on the last 20–60 years. In this study, we conducted an ensemble retrospective prediction from 1881 to 2017 using the Community Earth System Model in order to evaluate ENSO predictability and examine its variability on different time scales. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of ENSO predictability using a long-term ensemble hindcast with a CGCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".