MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ABOUT TECHNOLOGICAL FEATURES OF PRODUCTION OF REINFORSING BARS FROM PEARLITE GRADE STEELS

2021· article· en· W3214043794 on OpenAlex
Э. В. Парусов, С. И. Губенко, I. М. Chuiko, O. V. Parusov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Metallurgy and Heat Treatment of Metals · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyPearliteRaw materialHigh carbonAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Formulation of the problem. In the production of coiled rolled products from perlite grade steels, metallurgical enterprises encounter with the sorting of some batches of continuously cast billets or commercial products due to non-compliance with regulatory requirements. One of the alternative ways of using such blanks can be their reassignment for the production of thermally hardened reinforcing bars. In accordance with the edition of GOST 5781-82, it was possible to produce hot rolled reinforcing bars from steel grade 80C (carbon content 0,74…0,82 %), and according to TU 14-15-339-94 – thermally hardened with a carbon content of 0,50…0,85 % C. In world practice, reinforcing bars of a strength class similar to classes A800…A1000 (DSTU 3760:2019) are made mainly of high-carbon steels. The main type of stressed reinforcement in the EU, USA, Canada and Great Britain are rods with a nominal diameter of 26…40 mm of strength class 835…1030 MPa and 26…36 mm of strength class 1080…1230 MPa. An analysis of the requirements for reinforcing bars according to various regulatory documents shows that in the standards of Canada, the USA and the UK, the carbon content is not standardized, but according to the standards of Japan and Ukraine it is 0,45…0,80 % and 0,13…0,37 % respectively. According to the requirements of international standards, the minimum values of the yield strength and strength correspond to the reinforcing bar A800 (DSTU 3760:2019). Therefore, for the possibility of producing reinforcing bars from high-carbon steels, it is necessary to establish rational temperature-time conditions for heat hardening modes, which will ensure that the finished metal products comply with the requirements of DSTU 3760:2019. Purpose. Determine the influence of the parameters of the technology of thermal hardening on the features of the formation of the structure and mechanical properties of reinforcing bars made of steels with a carbon content of 0,50…0,90 %. Results. The possibility of producing reinforcing bars of strength classes А800 and А1000 from steels С56DВ, C70DВ, C80DВ and C82DВ (EN 16120-2:2017) using intermittent and interrupted quenching methods has been scientifically proven. In accordance with the results obtained, the industrial production of reinforcing bars of strength classes A800 and A1000 from these steels is expedient, since it will contribute to the improvement of technical and economic indicators in the production of coiled steel from perlite grade steels intended for high-strength products (cold-worked rebar, metal cord, bead wire, spring wire, reinforcing ropes, etc.). Based on the results of industrial experiments, a technical agreement was developed and approved for the production of pilot batches of thermally hardened reinforcing bars of strength classes A800 and A1000 from steels containing 0.50...0.90 % carbon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it