Dreaming the departure: construction of the myth among young Somali refugees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume Les jeunes refugies somaliens passent souvent par une longue transition premigratoire avant de rejoindre leur destination finale. Durant ce difficile passage, ils construisent ensemble un mythe du depart qui structure les strategies individuelles. La substitution du « voyage reve » au « voyage reel » en conduit quelques-uns, surtout si la transition se prolonge, a perdre contact avec la realite et a basculer dans la folie. Les auteurs fondent leur demonstration sur trois arguments : a) le pastoralisme conduit les Somaliens a valoriser le voyage en tant que moyen de maturation ; b) le groupe d’âges developpe une dynamique migratoire specifique ; c) l’ethique de la solidarite fait participer un grand nombre de personnes a l’aventure des jeunes migrants. Au cours de l’attente, les jeunes s’adonnent a des seances de mastication du qaat durant lesquelles ils se racontent des histoires de migration reussies et leurs reves de depart. Plus l’attente se prolonge, plus croit la frustration chez certains jeunes, chez qui le « reve du depart » se transforme en un « reve de folie », comme l’illustrent les deux cas rapportes. Cet article est base sur des recherches de terrain faites dans la Corne de l’Afrique et au Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".